Due Diligence – is it worth the effort?
For any major commercial transaction, you need to know exactly what you’re getting into and ensure (as far as is possible) that there aren’t going to be any nasty surprises further down the line.
In the same way that you would call on the services of a surveyor when thinking about buying a house, due diligence when you are merging or acquiring a practice can help you see what’s below the surface and avoid you making a costly mistake.
A GP practice merger or acquisition will typically involve:
- Legal due diligence – which focuses on all legal arrangements associated with a practice; and
- Financial due diligence – which examines the accounts and all financial dealings, usually from the last 3-4 years
For this blog, we are going to focus on legal due diligence.
Who can carry it out?
You may choose to carry out due diligence yourself, or ask your solicitor to deal with it. Using a solicitor has the benefit that everything will be documented in a business transfer agreement, with appropriate legally binding warranties and indemnities.
While certain issues are easy to identify, others are not. An experienced solicitor will know what to ask and recognise potential risks which you will want to know about.
What kind of risks may be identified?
In a GP practice merger or acquisition, the biggest risks will often be associated with:
- property
- the core contract
- staff
- pensions
but there may be others and it is important to undertake suitable investigation and raise enquiries.
Examples of issues you need to be aware of are onerous business contracts, unresolved disputes, and pending or threatened legal actions. Some of these will be documented, but others might not be.
Warranties & Indemnities
If there is any uncertainty, then you have the option to ask for a warranty from the partners, whereby they legally confirm what they have said is true. This may offer some comfort, but you may also want a series of indemnities to protect you from future liabilities crystallising. Just bear in mind that an indemnity is only as good as the financial standing of the person who gives it.
Our recommendations
At the end of the due diligence exercise, you should feel confident that you understand any risks and can make one of three choices: accept the position, mitigate the risks or walk away.
Undertaking a merger or acquisition is a big decision. The benefit of due diligence is that it can help you identify early on where the high-risk areas may be. It isn’t something you have to do, but we would always recommend it.
Fortunately, most practice mergers go through without incident and due diligence doesn’t reveal any problems. However, for those unlucky few where a major problem is highlighted, it will have been time and money well spent. Think of a due diligence exercise as similar to taking out an insurance policy.
For more information, please contact Daphne Robertson on 01483 511555 or email d.robertson@drsolicitors.com
News
Why succession planning is vital for any GP partnership
When you’re busy dealing with the day-to-day responsibility of running a GP practice, planning for the future can sometimes take a backseat. But there is one area you cannot afford to overlook and that’s succession planning.
There will naturally be some level of movement within any GP partnership, from individuals moving on, to those retiring or choosing to leave general practice altogether. Indeed, figures from Health Service Journal reveal that more than 20 per cent of GPs are approaching average retirement age in some areas of the UK.
These ‘normal’ problems are however exacerbated by the current recruitment crisis in General Practice, such that in many areas it is proving near impossible to recruit new GP partners.
Knowing how you will manage losing a partner and taking steps to eliminate or reduce any potential issues, is a vital part of the process. Having a robust succession plan in place is key, for the protection of the practice, the patients, and the interests of partners.
Problems you may encounter when the number of partners declines include:
- Potential breach of lease – A surgery lease will often specify the minimum number of tenants, with the figure commonly set at two.
- Difficulty getting a mortgage – It may prove difficult for a practice with just a couple of partners to obtain a mortgage on a large/valuable building. As a minimum you can expect to face higher interest rates and have to contribute greater equity.
- Profitability at risk – Locums and salaried GPs are now frequently more costly than partners, so the loss of a partner may threaten the underlying profitability of the business.
- Increased pressures and commitment – Dealing with the management and regulation needed to run a GP practice is much easier when it’s shared between a number of partners. The fewer people involved, the bigger the commitment each partner needs to make.
- GMS/PMS contract issues – Once the partner to patient ratio becomes too skewed questions may get asked about your ability to deliver your clinical care obligations. NHSE can terminate a contract if they consider “that the change in membership of the partnership is likely to have a serious adverse impact on the ability of the Contractor or the PCT to perform its obligations”.
- Fear of the ‘last man standing’ issue – If the Partnership Deed obliges you to buy out a retiring partner, this can trigger a run as everybody tries to avoid being the ‘last man standing’. But even if you aren’t obliged, the result may be the surgery being part owned by people who have no interest in the business, which can create its own problems.
So, what can you do?
There are several steps you can take to try and reduce the risk of problems. They include:
- Increase the timeframe within which partners must leave their capital in the business following a retirement – ideally, until a replacement has been found
- Reduce the risk of a rush to exit by requiring a gap between retirements within the Partnership Deed. This should give you more time to recruit a replacement
- Consider undertaking a merger to increase the size of the partnership
- Make yourself a teaching practice and thereby more attractive to junior doctors who may be interested in becoming a partner in the future
- Agree what will happen to the mortgage following retirement. For example, specify whether retirees will be liable for a percentage of any early redemption penalty
- Consider promoting or recruiting a practice manager as a partner, to share the management load and further spread any risk
- Open channels of communication with NHSE and establish what additional support may be available to you
Our recommendations
Prevention is always better than cure, especially when it comes to handling a retirement and the loss of a partner. It will always be far easier to plan ahead, than to deal with an issue should it arise. Taking time to consider all the potential implications and having a robust succession plan in place that is fully documented within the Partnership Deed, will offer you the greatest protection.
If you are facing any of the problems we’ve mentioned here, or for advice on undertaking a comprehensive succession plan, we’d urge you to seek the advice of an experienced legal team, who will ensure your interests are protected.
For more information about succession planning, Partnership Deeds, or any other related issues, please contact Daphne Robertson on 01483 511555 or email d.robertson@drsolicitors.com
News
Are you in breach of your GMS or PMS contract?
A GMS contract is a legally binding agreement made between a GP practice and NHS England (NHSE) that sets out certain obligations for both parties. It is the most important asset a practice will hold.
Running to over 270 pages plus lengthy appendices, it is a substantial and complicated document, both to navigate and understand.
Unless a practice has read it from beginning to end, and has very careful monitoring in place, it is likely that most practices will be in breach of their obligations at some point or another – in many cases, without realising.
So, what can practices do to protect their contracts?
Dealing with a breach
There are many reasons why a practice may be in breach of their GMS contract. Some are minor and some more serious.
If you do become aware of a contractual breach, you should rectify the problem as soon as possible and put procedures in place to ensure it doesn’t happen again. You should then assess the impact of the breach.
An example of a minor breach might be a failure to keep the practice leaflet or website up to date. There is not normally any obligation to inform NHSE of these minor breaches, although a practice would be obliged to provide such information if requested. If NHSE were to find out they would probably issue a breach or remediation notice. Once a practice receives two or more of these, NHSE become entitled to terminate the contract on notice, subject to a cumulative impact test.
For more serious breaches, you may be obliged to notify NHSE. In particular you should notify NHSE as soon as reasonably practicable, of “any serious incident that, in your reasonable opinion, affects or is likely to affect your performance of your obligations under the contract.”
Whilst this leaves room for ambiguity, a breach would certainly be considered ‘serious’ if it put patient safety at risk. An example of this might be a failure of the vaccine fridge, combined with inadequate records to prove that the no vaccines had been compromised.
Once NHSE becomes aware of a serious breach, they would consider whether to deal with it under the breach and remediation notices procedure outlines above, or possibly to terminate the contract forthwith. They could only do the latter, however, if they could show that patient safety was at serious risk.
There are particular notification requirements for breaches where:
- a contractor is no longer eligible to hold a contract – for example, if there is no General Practitioner left in the partnership
- if a partner becomes bankrupt, convicted of a serious criminal offence, is disqualified or suspended, or if a partnership is dissolved
In these instances there is a requirement to notify NHSE, who then need to consider contract termination (although there is not necessarily a requirement for them to terminate).
It is worth noting that while we are talking about GMS contracts in this blog, PMS contracts usually – but not always – have very similar clauses so always refer to your individual contract to be sure.
Our recommendations
We advise practices to familiarise themselves with their core contracts and ensure they understand their obligations. Put systems in place to help monitor compliance and if a breach occurs, attempt to remedy the situation as soon as possible and put processes in place to prevent it happening again.
In the case of more serious breaches, for which practices are obliged to inform NHSE, you should let them know as soon as you can, include an impact assessment, and show that procedures have been put in place to reduce the risk of re-occurrence.
The complex nature of the core contract means it is not always clear whether you might be in breach, nor whether you need to notify NHSE. If you are in any doubt about your compliance, the severity of a breach, or if you have received a breach or remediation notice, then always seek the advice of an experienced legal team.
For more information about managing a breach, or any other related issues, please contact Daphne Robertson on 01483 511555 or email d.robertson@drsolicitors.com
News
What are the legal implications of recent changes to the SFE?
Most GP practices will be aware of the recent changes to the Statement of Financial Entitlements (SFE), which came into force on 1 April 2017.
Since the revised SFE provides for both new income streams and changes to existing potential income streams, decisions need to be made as to how this additional income is to be allocated. These rules, once agreed, then need to be correctly documented.
We’ve highlighted below some of the key changes and what you need to consider from a legal perspective:
Reimbursement of CQC Fees
A system of direct reimbursement will be introduced whereby practices can submit their paid invoices to NHS England, or their CCG (under delegated commissioning) and will receive full reimbursement of the amount paid.
However, this raises two potential issues. Firstly, the practice has to pay the fees before it can claim a refund. Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, there is an assumption that the contractor is the CQC registered provider. This will usually be the case for GMS practices but arguably is not normally the case for PMS practices. This could be a source of dispute in due course.
Reimbursement of Indemnity insurance costs
Funds have been allocated to cover rising indemnity insurance costs. This money will be paid to practices on a per patient basis, but the intention is that the monies should go to whoever is paying the insurance premiums.
If practices pay for the PI cover for all their staff, they should keep the monies and share as they see fit. Normally, this would be between the partners in profit sharing ratios.
However, the situation is different if any GPs working at the practice pay for their own PI cover. The practice must then reimburse an appropriate proportion of that individual’s PI cover cost.
Depending on your circumstances, this could necessitate changes to your Partnership Agreement, employment contracts, and locum contracts.
Changes to GP retention Scheme
Improvements have been made to the GP retention scheme, whereby GPs who are planning on retiring (or who meet certain other criteria) are able to apply for retention monies as an incentive to stay in general practice.
If successful, these monies will be paid to the practice and partners will need to agree how the monies are to be shared. Normally, the individual will expect to take these monies as a prior share, but unless this is clearly agreed by all the partners, the default would be that the monies are shared in profit sharing ratios.
Changes to sickness absence payments
Changes have also been made in relation to sickness absence payments, which can be made for both locums (as previously) and now for the practice’s GPs covering each other. This seems a sensible change which may be helpful for many practices.
However, this scenario is often not contemplated in partnership agreements so could give rise to debate and conflict over how to fairly allocate the additional income.
Our recommendations
We recommend that you consider the changes and assess their impact on your current processes. If there are any necessary changes (which we would expect there to be) you will need to review your existing partnership agreement and potentially your salaried GP contracts and locum contracts, to check they reflect what you have agreed.
Remember, if you don’t have a partnership agreement in place, or it is lacking in detail with regards to specific issues, then the legal position by default will be that everything is shared in established profit sharing ratios.
As an aside, while the SFE applies to GMS contracts by default, it will only apply to PMS contracts where the contract specifically states this. If you are in any doubt, you should check your PMS contract.
For more information about the impact of these changes, or any other enquiries, please contact Daphne Robertson on 01483 511555 or email d.robertson@drsolicitors.com
News
Why is a partnership offer letter so important?
Taking on a new partner is a significant step for any GP practice, and it is important to get it right from the outset.
Once a new Partner has been selected, a partnership offer letter should be next on the agenda.
Why do you need one?
The letter will act as written confirmation of the key terms of the appointment. By properly documenting and setting out the terms in this way, the offer letter can provide some protection for the Partnership until the Partnership Deed is updated, and reduces the risk of dispute over the offered terms.
What about the partnership deed?
The admission of a partner is something that needs to be dealt with within a partnership deed as soon as possible once your offer has been accepted.
Practices often find difficulty in updating the Partnership Deed before the start date, which makes the offer letter even more vital, as it will act as a holding agreement until the Deed is resigned.
There is a misconception that a partnership deed shouldn’t be updated until after an incoming Partner has completed their probation period. This approach is not advisable for a number of reasons and ultimately you can end up as a partnership at will which can put your contract at risk.
What should the offer letter cover?
The offer letter needs to be consistent with the existing arrangements that are set out in the existing partnership deed. The key things it should include, are:
- Commencement date
- Offer of partnership – clearly stating that the position is self-employed
- Notifications – confirming that notifications will be given to NHS England & CQC once the offer if accepted
- Sessions – outlining in detail the sessions that are expected to be covered
- Partnership share – explaining how earnings will be worked out
- Working capital – detailing any working capital contribution that is expected
- Surgery premises – attaching a copy of the surgery lease and outlining there will be shared liability for the lease terms, including the rent. If there is to be a commitment to buy into the surgery premises, this should also be stated
- Mutual assessment period – detailing any probation period and what it will entail, including notice periods Annual Leave entitlement
- Administrative requirements – stating that proof of identity and qualifications, eligibility to work in the UK and an up to date CRB check will all be needed prior to the partnership commencing
- Acceptance – the time frame within which the offer must be accepted
- Partnership Deed – a copy of the Partnership Deed, the terms of which they must consent
Our recommendations
Make sure your offer letter is clear and sets out all the key points; it should be signed by one or more of the current Partners and have place for the new recruit to sign by way of acceptance of the terms.
You then need to get the partnership deed updated as quickly as possible, and preferably ahead of the new partner starting.
As with any contracts and partnership issues, it is always advisable to seek the support of an experienced legal team, who can ensure you put yourself in the strongest possible position.
For more information about employment contracts and any other related issues, please contact Daphne Robertson on 01483 511555 or email d.robertson@drsolicitors.com
News
What is the BMA model contract and does it apply to me?
The BMA model contract was introduced in 2004 to try and ensure a common standard for GPs employed by practices and those employed by PCOs. The PCOs have since become CCGs and NHS England, and they no longer employ significant numbers of GPs. Nonetheless, the BMA Model Contract has endured. All practices which it applies to must offer their salaried GPs the BMA model employment contract, or ‘terms no less favourable’.
Over the last 10 years the profile of the profession has changed drastically. There are now many more salaried GPs than ever before and most of them should probably be on BMA model contracts or similar.
Who does it apply to?
It is an express term of all GMS Contracts that the GMS Practice must offer their salaried GPs BMA model contracts or terms no less favourable.
The definition of a salaried GP includes:
- Salaried GP who undertakes special interest work (a GPwSI)
- Assistant
- Associate
- GP retainee
- Flexible Career Scheme GP
- Returner scheme GP
- Salaried GP employed to work out-of-hours.
PMS and APMS practices
The position for PMS and APMS practices is more complex. The NHS England Standard PMS Agreement 2015/16 contains the same requirement as GMS, but most PMS practices hold different, older contracts.
The original intention was that PMS would be locally negotiated. Some local commissioners included a clause requiring BMA Model Contracts in their PMS contracts, whilst others did not.
The only way to be sure is to read your PMS or APMS Contract – something very few practices ever do.
Is it a standard template?
The BMA model contract is a downloadable template document, but it doesn’t have to be used in its exact form. The phrase ‘no less favourable’ means it can be varied and negotiated. The employee and employer might agree to change some of the terms, perhaps trading some leave for pay and so on. In the end it is up to the parties to decide whether they regard a change to the model as a favourable one or not.
We generally advise practices to carefully consider the wording of the contract rather than simply adopting it wholesale. There are some important employer protections which are found in most other employment contracts and which are not in the BMA Model. Also, you will probably want to ensure that your salaried GPs are not on radically different terms to your other clinical and possibly also non clinical employees.
What if you get it wrong?
If the requirement is in your GMS/PMS/APMS contract and you employ salaried GPs on terms which are less favourable than the BMA model contract, then you are in contractual breach. If NHS England become aware of this, they will almost certainly issue the practice with a ‘Remediation Notice’. This will require you to rectify the situation within a given timescale and sanctions could also be imposed. If 2 or more breach or remediation notices are issued NHS England would be entitled to consider termination of the contract.
Recommendations
If you are a GMS Contract and are not offering the BMA Model Contract or terms no less favourable, you should consider taking steps to rectify the situation.
If you are a PMS or APMS practice then your first step should be to check your NHS E contract to see if the BMA model applies.
Aim to have an open discussion with the person you’re looking to employ, to negotiate the terms that will be most favourable for both parties. You need to find a positive balance between the best interests of the practice and the individual. Just remember that overall, the terms and conditions must be deemed ‘no less favourable’ than those set out in the BMA model contract.
In general this is a surprisingly tricky area of law, and something which both employer and employee can get very exercised about. If you’re at all unsure about your situation, then always seek the advice of an experienced legal team who will be able to assist you.
For more information about employment contracts, any other related issues, please contact Daphne Robertson on 01483 511555 or email d.robertson@drsolicitors.com
News
Dealing with property in a GP practice merger
There is a lot to think about when merging practices. Issues include transfer of staff by TUPE, creating joint accounts, agreeing profit shares, drafting a new Partnership Agreement, aligning ways of working, dealing with the CQC and NHS England, and more.
With so much to think about and with limited time and resources, merging practices are often tempted to put the properties to one side to be dealt with later. In this post we explain why it’s best to have a plan for managing property issues from the outset.
But nothing is going to change?
We are often told that the surgeries will ‘just stay as they are’, or that their ownership can be kept outside of the new partnership. However, it’s not that simple and by taking no action you risk hitting problems later.
A merger involves changing business vehicles. Generally speaking, two or more partnerships become a new, single partnership and most of the legacy business vehicles disappear. Each of the legacy partnerships would have had rights of occupation in their surgery, whether as tenant, licensee, owner occupier, or some combination of all these. Post merger, even if exactly the same partners and staff are working in each building, the occupier will be the new merged partnership.
The consequences of this are significant. Regardless of who has their name on the title at the Land Registry and whether the surgery is freehold or leasehold, the new partnership will acquire rights and obligations associated with the building from the very first day post merger. Examples can include; rights of occupancy; tax liabilities; problems with NHS premises funding; implications for mortgage financing; breaches of covenants, and; unexpected changes in value.
Such problems typically lie ‘dormant’ for some time, before emerging and creating a crisis. When this happens and has the inevitable financial consequences, the partners who were around at the time of the merger may be long gone and it becomes difficult to attribute the resultant costs.
Some questions you need to consider:
- How are the premises currently owned and occupied?
- How will they be owned and occupied following the merger?
- Will any premises be closing and if so, what are the implications?
- Do you need to seek prior approval from NHS England for changes in occupancy/use? (see our article Don’t put your premises funding at risk)
- How are the new owners/occupiers going to be tied into any leasehold obligations?
- How will the changes impact on any mortgage financing and do you need mortgagor consent?
- Do you need to obtain landlord’s consent?
- Is there an impact on the amount of premises funding?
- Tax impacts, such as, stamp duty land tax (SDLT), capital gains tax)
Our recommendations
Our advice is to do your homework in plenty of time before the merger and ensure you undertake appropriate due diligence on all the properties involved. Once you understand the implications of the proposed changes you can consider your options for mitigating the problems. Doing nothing is certainly an option, but it is unlikely to be the best one.
Remember that the Surgery is almost always the most valuable asset in a GP Practice. It therefore pays to get professional advice to protect it and maximise its value.
For more information about practice mergers, property, or any other enquiries, please contact Daphne Robertson on 01483 511555 or email d.robertson@drsolicitors.com
News
Can your patient list be ‘open but full’?
From funding cuts, to an aging population and the increasing demands being placed on primary care services, GP practices face ever increasing pressure.
Balancing growing patient numbers with resource constraints can prove a challenge and may lead some practices to consider restricting the growth of their patient list.
Can such a move ever be justified and what could the potential implications be?
The regulations
Current regulations specify that a GP practice must provide:
- Essential services to all registered patients and temporary residents
- Primary medical services for an accident or emergency situation happening in the practice area within core working hours
- Immediate treatment when necessary of any person whose application for inclusion on the patient list has been refused but who is not yet registered with another provider
For an individual to apply to join your patient list, they must live within the practice area, or be entitled to seek acceptance as a temporary resident.
A practice with an open patient list may only refuse an application to join their list if they have ‘reasonable grounds’ for doing so.
Capping a list
Much of the discussion around refusing to register patients focuses on the definition of reasonable grounds. The rules are clear that the following would not be reasonable grounds to refuse: age; appearance; disability or medical condition; gender or gender reassignment; marriage or civil partnership; pregnancy or maternity; race; religion or belief; sexual orientation; or social class.
Examples provided which might be reasonable grounds for refusal include an applicant living in the outer boundary area, or if they have previously been removed from the list – particularly if this was because of a history of violence.
This obviously leaves some uncertainty around the reasonableness of other possible grounds, and some commentators have suggested that staffing shortages and resource constraints would be sufficient grounds to refuse all new applications. This is sometimes known as ‘open but full’ or ‘list capping’.
To informally cap a list by refusing to register new patients, your reason for doing so must be extremely serious. For example, if a practice strongly believes that registering more patients will overstretch its ability to provide the necessary services, it may be arguable that patient safety is at risk. This situation could, in theory, justify a short-term list closure but a practice would be well advised to further justify their decision with some analysis of the risk.
However, should you routinely start refusing to register new patients then you may find yourself on shaky ground. You will need to show you are actively working on a solution, such as seeking help or getting in additional resources, and doing all you can to resolve the problem.
Closing a list
If the problems you are facing are very severe and no short-term solution looks likely, then a formal closure of the list should be pursued. To do so, you would need to make an application to NHSE for their approval to close it for a period of between 3 and 12 months.
Such applications should never be entered into lightly. They require a great amount of detail to be supplied about the difficulties being experienced in delivering services, the help that NHSE may be able to give to alleviate those difficulties and also any discussions that have been had with existing patients.
The regulations do not spell out the exact grounds on which the closure of a list may be justified, but in these difficult times NHS England will likely seek to rigorously challenge your application.
In summary
A practice may potentially justify what amounts to an informal list closure without applying for a formal list closure, if the circumstances are deemed serious enough – such as putting patient safety at risk – and if the problem is perceived as short-term.
However, capping a patient list should only ever be seen as an extreme and temporary measure, as otherwise the list closure process should be followed.
If you’re at all concerned, we would generally recommend you contact your LMC in the first instance to discuss the problems you are facing and see what help and support is available to you.
For more information about practice management, or any other enquiries, please contact Nils Christiansen on 01483 511555 or email n.christiansen@drsolicitors.com
News
Pensions protection scheme deadline approaches
The start of a new fiscal year is fast approaching and with it comes an important deadline for any GP nearing retirement.
If you’ve built up a healthy pension pot, then Individual Protection 2014 (IP2014) is a scheme that could help you reduce, or avoid, a tax liability on your savings. But with an April 5 2017 deadline, time is running out to apply.
What is IP2014?
The lifetime pension allowance was reduced from £1.5 million to £1.25 million in April 2014, then lowered again in April 2016 to £1 million. Any pension savings above this level are taxed at a significantly increased rate.
Since reducing the lifetime limit could be seen as unfair to those who had already accrued large pension pots, IP2014 was introduced to enable such people to safeguard their pension savings and effectively ‘lock-in’ the higher lifetime savings allowance. However, IP2014 is not an automatic right and must be applied for. We understand that significant numbers of GPs who may benefit from IP2014 protection have not applied. The deadline for applying is 5 April 2017.
Are you affected?
If the total value of your pension benefits exceeded £1.25m as at 5th April 2014 you are potentially able to secure Individual Protection 2014. The calculation to perform is:
(NHS Pension x 20) + Lump Sum + Private Pension Fund Value
The problem is that this calculation requires information on valuations from the NHS Pensions Agency and the demands on their time are currently significant. Fortunately the required information should also be available online, but you would be well advised to check soon if you have not already done so as the tax savings can be significant.
Our recommendations
At DR Solicitors, we believe in always seeking expert advice from specialist advisers. We do not advise on tax or pensions, but we do stay current with all the various regulatory and commercial issues which may affect our clients.
If you are concerned about IP2014 or any other aspect of your pension planning you should always seek the advice of a specialist IFA or accountant who understands the intricacies of the NHS Pension Scheme. We are always happy to make introductions to our extensive network of primary care advisers including specialist accountants, surveyors, banks, IFAs and consultants.
For more information, please contact Nils Christiansen on 01483 511555 or email n.christiansen@drsolicitors.com
News
Partnership disputes – the early warning signs
Partnership disputes can be expensive, time consuming and destructive; not to mention unpleasant for all parties involved.
If you find yourself having to deal with a partnership dispute, the best protection for any practice is to have a valid partnership deed in place.
To help you spot the early warning signs of a potential dispute, we have pulled together a list of some of the most common causes of partnership disputes:
- Underperformance: Partnerships are based on the principles of trust and fairness. Negative feelings can start to creep in, if there is a perception that one partner is underperforming. For example, if they are perceived as not pulling their weight, have a lack of attention to practice management responsibilities, or exhibit poor time keeping and organisational skills.
- Money: Financial concerns are one of the most frequent causes of disputes. They can range from arguments over alleged financial impropriety, to non-property owning partners paying for building costs, the sharing of outside earnings, or the profit share to workload ratio.
- Unacceptable behaviour: Disputes can arise when a partner is considered by others to be behaving in an unacceptable way. Examples of this include: bullying, harassment, discrimination, inappropriate use of computer systems (sometimes even during consultations) and self-prescribing.
- Clinical concerns: Every clinician has a professional obligation to report any clinical concerns they may have. By themselves, these issues won’t necessarily lead to a partnership dispute. However, problems can arise when clinical issues are covered up, reveal a lack of insight, or if they put a partner’s GMC registration at risk.
- Personality clash: Personality clashes can fester for years. Such disputes are usually best dealt with through mediation and the LMC can often help in such circumstances. However, successful mediation requires that the partners in conflict demonstrate insight and work on changing their behaviour, which can sometimes be difficult.
- Sickness absence: When a partner is frequently off sick, or takes a long period of sickness absence, this can contribute towards a feeling that they are not ‘pulling their weight’. A locum can be used to backfill but they will not be sharing any of the management workload, which means extra pressure is felt by the remaining partners.
- Generational differences: Generational interests are sometimes not aligned. For example, a partner nearing retirement may be keen to preserve capital and minimise unnecessary change, whilst a younger partner may be keen to invest in new premises or different working patterns. Disputes of this nature can lead to issues with 24 hour retirement planning, or even age discrimination claims.
- Surgery Premises: Incoming partners are showing less interest in buying into surgery premises than they did in the past. They are also often unwilling to sign up to a long lease. This can cause problems for other partners, who may be keen to move on or retire and are unable to divest themselves of the property interest.
Why your partnership deed is important
A well drafted partnership deed can help minimise the disruption caused by a dispute or avoid the dispute altogether. It will seek to anticipate many of the issues mentioned above and provide an agreed framework for resolving them.
For example, it can state grounds for expelling a partner; document the terms of absences from the practice; ensure that all partners have the right to 24 hour retirement; and specify a dispute resolution process. Importantly, it can also prevent a partnership from being dissolved in the event of a dispute, as this can put the GMS/PMS contract – and therefore the practice – at risk.
Our recommendations
If you are unlucky enough to find yourself in dispute with your partners, then make sure you seek professional legal advice at an early stage. It is important that you know where you stand legally, so you can avoid doing anything which may compromise your position. Fortunately, most partnership disputes will be settled without the need for litigation. In the meantime, please ensure you have a valid and up to date Partnership Agreement.
For more expert advice, download our free guide: ‘Top 10 tips for dealing with partnership disputes‘.
For more information about Partnership Agreements or disputes, please contact Daphne Robertson on 01483 511555 or email d.robertson@drsolicitors.com